Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium 4 2.26

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium 4 2.26 Performance Spectrum

Athlon MP 2400+

1 / 1

305

+3.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Pentium 4 2.26

1 / 1

295

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium 4 2.26 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium 4 2.26: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon MP 2400+

2002

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($151 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
✅Delivers 65.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 2.0 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($151 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
✅Draws 60W instead of 110W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium 4 2.26

2002

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon MP 2400+ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (295 vs 305).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 2.0 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $151 MSRP).
❌83.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon MP 2400+ better than Pentium 4 2.26?

Yes. Athlon MP 2400+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon MP 2400+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon MP 2400+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon MP 2400+ is the better buy right now. Athlon MP 2400+ comes in $90 cheaper on MSRP at $151 MSRP versus $241 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 65.0% better value on MSRP (2.0 vs 1.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon MP 2400+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium 4 2.26 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon MP 2400+

The Athlon MP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 December 2002 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $228.

Pentium 4 2.26

The Pentium 4 2.26 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 295 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon MP 2400+ and Pentium 4 2.26 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon MP 2400+ versus 2.26 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.26 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.26. The Athlon MP 2400+ uses the K7 (2000−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.26 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon MP 2400+ scores 305 against the Pentium 4 2.26's 295 — a 3.3% lead for the Athlon MP 2400+.

Feature	Athlon MP 2400+	Pentium 4 2.26
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.26 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512 kB+100%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	K7 (2000−2004)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	305+3%	295

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon MP 2400+ was priced at $151, while the Pentium 4 2.26 came in at $241. On launch pricing ($151 vs $241), Athlon MP 2400+ was $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon MP 2400+ delivers 2.0 pts/$ vs 1.2 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 2.26 — making the Athlon MP 2400+ the 49.1% better value option.

Feature	Athlon MP 2400+	Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP	$151-37%	$241
Performance per Dollar	2.0+67%	1.2
Release Date	2002	2002

Search Athlon MP 2400+ on Amazon

Search Pentium 4 2.26 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.