Athlon MP 2400+ vs Celeron 2.30
Athlon MP 2400+
Celeron 2.30
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon MP 2400+ is positioned at rank 1022 and the Celeron 2.30 is on rank 1092, so the Athlon MP 2400+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon MP 2400+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.30
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon MP 2400+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (K7 (2000−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon MP 2400+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+113%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon MP 2400+ and Celeron 2.30
Athlon MP 2400+
The Athlon MP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 December 2002 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $228.
Celeron 2.30
The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon MP 2400+ and Celeron 2.30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon MP 2400+ versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 — a 14% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Athlon MP 2400+ uses the K7 (2000−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 2.30 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon MP 2400+ scores 305 against the Celeron 2.30's 325 — a 6.3% lead for the Celeron 2.30.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2400+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB+100% | 128 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Architecture | K7 (2000−2004) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| PassMark | 305 | 325+7% |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon MP 2400+ versus DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.30 — the Celeron 2.30 supports -201.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon MP 2400+) and 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.30).
| Feature | Athlon MP 2400+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-266 | DDR1-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon MP 2400+) / No (Celeron 2.30). Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2400+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon MP 2400+ launched at $151 MSRP, while the Celeron 2.30 debuted at $100. At current prices ($20 vs $10), the Celeron 2.30 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon MP 2400+ delivers 15.3 pts/$ vs 32.5 pts/$ for the Celeron 2.30 — making the Celeron 2.30 the 72.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2400+ | Celeron 2.30 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $151 | $100-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $10-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 32.5+112% |
| Release Date | 2002 | 2003 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon MP 2400+ and Celeron 2.30
