Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium M 1.30

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium M 1.30 Performance Spectrum

Athlon MP 2400+

1 / 1

305

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Pentium M 1.30

1 / 1

315

+3.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium M 1.30 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium M 1.30: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon MP 2400+

2002

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (305 vs 315).
❌Launch MSRP is still $151 MSRP, while Pentium M 1.30 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌150% higher power demand at 60W vs 24W.

Pentium M 1.30

2003

Why buy it

✅+3.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 24W instead of 60W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 1.30 better than Athlon MP 2400+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon MP 2400+ is ahead with 53.8% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.30 pulls ahead with 3.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.30 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 1.30 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 1.30 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $151 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.3% better PassMark. Athlon MP 2400+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2002 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (2.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 1.30 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2003 vs 2002) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon MP 2400+ vs Pentium M 1.30 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon MP 2400+

The Athlon MP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 December 2002 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $228.

Pentium M 1.30

The Pentium M 1.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon MP 2400+ and Pentium M 1.30 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon MP 2400+ versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium M 1.30 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the Athlon MP 2400+. The Athlon MP 2400+ uses the K7 (2000−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 1.30 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon MP 2400+ scores 305 against the Pentium M 1.30's 315 — a 3.2% lead for the Pentium M 1.30.

Feature	Athlon MP 2400+	Pentium M 1.30
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+54%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	1 MB+300%
Process	130 nm	130 nm
Architecture	K7 (2000−2004)	Banias (2003)
PassMark	305	315+3%