Atom N435 vs Celeron 2.30

Atom N435

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011

Celeron 2.30

1 Cores1 Thrd73 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Atom N435

1 / 2

335

+3.1%

325

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N435 is positioned at rank 646 and the Celeron 2.30 is on rank 1092, so the Atom N435 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N435

#634

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

876%

#635

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

863%

#636

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

792%

#637

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

789%

#638

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

781%

#640

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

755%

#641

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

724%

#642

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

722%

#643

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

703%

#646

Atom N435

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#650

Core i5-1345UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.30

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

95912%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

90628%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

65803%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

19824%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

15702%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

13737%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

7868%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

7765%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

7070%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

7070%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

6990%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

6802%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

6707%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

6680%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

6619%

#1092

Celeron 2.30

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

100%

#1093

Phenom X4 9450e

MSRP: $450|Avg: $430

99%

#1094

Athlon 64 X2 3800+

MSRP: $354|Avg: $20

95%

#1095

Athlon 64 3000+

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

93%

#1096

Athlon XP 3100+

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

87%

#1097

Athlon 64 3300+

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

80%

#1098

Athlon 64 2800+

MSRP: $178|Avg: $15

73%

#1099

Athlon 64 3700+

MSRP: $272|Avg: $20

70%

#1100

Athlon 64 FX-72

MSRP: $799|Avg: $40

69%

#1101

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

MSRP: $581|Avg: $110

66%

#1102

Athlon 64 3500+

MSRP: $272|Avg: $10

65%

#1103

Pentium D 830

MSRP: $316|Avg: $20

60%

#1104

Pentium D 960

MSRP: $523|Avg: $15

59%

#1105

Athlon XP 2500+

MSRP: $172|Avg: $15

57%

#1106

Athlon 64 3800+

MSRP: $354|Avg: $10

56%

#1107

Pentium 4 2.53

MSRP: $193|Avg: $13

55%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom N435 (2011) utilizes 45 nm technology and DDR2, DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Atom N435	Celeron 2.30
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Pinetrail (2009−2011) / 45 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 2.30 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Atom N435	Celeron 2.30
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Atom N435 Benchmark Check

Celeron 2.30 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N435 and Celeron 2.30

Atom N435

The Atom N435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 2.30

The Celeron 2.30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N435 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Celeron 2.30's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom N435 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 2.30 — a 53.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.30. The Atom N435 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 2.30 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N435 scores 335 against the Celeron 2.30's 325 — a 3% lead for the Atom N435.

Feature	Atom N435	Celeron 2.30
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	2.3 GHz+73%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB+300%	128 kB
Process	45 nm-65%	130 nm
Architecture	Pinetrail (2009−2011)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	335+3%	325

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N435 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2.30 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Atom N435 versus DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.30 — the Atom N435 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2.30 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N435) and 845,850,865 (Celeron 2.30).

Feature	Atom N435	Celeron 2.30
Socket	FCBGA559	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800+200%	DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N435) / No (Celeron 2.30). The Atom N435 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron 2.30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2.30 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.30 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.