Atom N435 vs E-240

Atom N435 vs E-240 Performance Spectrum

Atom N435

1 / 2

335

0.0%

338

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N435 vs E-240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N435 vs E-240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N435

2011

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while E-240 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (335 vs 338).

E-240

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N435 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E-240 better than Atom N435?

Yes. E-240 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E-240 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 12.8% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E-240 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E-240 still makes the most sense overall. E-240 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E-240 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Atom N435 vs E-240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N435

The Atom N435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $69.

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N435 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the E-240's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom N435 versus 1.5 GHz on the E-240 — a 12% clock advantage for the E-240. The Atom N435 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the E-240 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N435 scores 335 against the E-240's 338 — a 0.9% lead for the E-240.

Feature	Atom N435	E-240
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	1.5 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	45 nm	40 nm-11%
Architecture	Pinetrail (2009−2011)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	335	338