Atom N435
VS
E-240

Atom N435 vs E-240

Intel

Atom N435

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011
VS
AMD

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N435 is positioned at rank 646 and the E-240 is on rank 1169, so the Atom N435 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N435

#634
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
876%
#635
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
863%
#636
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
792%
#637
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
789%
#638
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
781%
#640
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
755%
#641
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
724%
#642
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
722%
#643
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
703%
#646
Atom N435
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E-240

#1157
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4340%
#1158
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4277%
#1159
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3926%
#1160
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3908%
#1161
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3872%
#1163
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3740%
#1164
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3586%
#1165
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3580%
#1166
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3484%
#1169
E-240
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The E-240 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom N435 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom N435E-240
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Pinetrail (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom N435E-240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N435 and E-240

Intel

Atom N435

The Atom N435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom N435 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the E-240's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom N435 versus 1.5 GHz on the E-240 — a 12% clock advantage for the E-240. The Atom N435 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the E-240 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N435 scores 335 against the E-240's 338 — a 0.9% lead for the E-240.

FeatureAtom N435E-240
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.33 GHz
1.5 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
45 nm
40 nm-11%
Architecture
Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
335
338
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N435 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E-240 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom N435E-240
Socket
FCBGA559
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N435 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the E-240 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom N435E-240
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150