
Atom N455

Core i5-10400F
Atom N455 vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom N455 vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom N455 vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom N455
2010Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (345 vs 13,029).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1825.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom N455.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Atom N455 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N455 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Atom N455?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom N455 vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N455
The Atom N455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $64.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Atom N455 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.67 GHz on the Atom N455 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 88.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.66 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Atom N455 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N455 scores 345 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 189.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N455 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Atom N455 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 6 / 12+500% |
| Boost Clock | 1.67 GHz | 4.3 GHz+157% |
| Base Clock | 1.66 GHz | 2.9 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Pinetrail (2009−2011) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 345 | 13,029+3677% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N455 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N455 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 299.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N455) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom N455) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N455) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Atom N455 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-667 | DDR4-2666+300% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB | 128 GB+6300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom N455) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Atom N455 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Atom N455 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













