Atom N550 vs Celeron J4025
Atom N550
Celeron J4025
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N550 is positioned at rank 618 and the Celeron J4025 is on rank 537, so the Celeron J4025 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom N550
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4025
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom N550 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom N550 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom N550 and Celeron J4025
Atom N550
The Atom N550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,435 points. Launch price was $86.
Celeron J4025
The Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Atom N550 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron J4025's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Atom N550 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron J4025 — a 63.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J4025 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom N550 uses the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron J4025 uses Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N550 scores 1,435 against the Celeron J4025's 1,450 — a 1% lead for the Celeron J4025. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N550 vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4025.
| Feature | Atom N550 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz+93% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Pineview (2009−2011) | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) |
| PassMark | 1,435 | 1,450+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N550 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J4025 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-667 on the Atom N550 versus 2400 on the Celeron J4025 — the Celeron J4025 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J4025 supports up to 8 of RAM compared to 2 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N550) vs 2 (Celeron J4025). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom N550) vs 6 (Celeron J4025) — the Celeron J4025 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N550) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4025).
| Feature | Atom N550 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-667 | 2400+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2 GB+26214300% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 6 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom N550) / true (Celeron J4025). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom N550) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4025) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4025 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| Feature | Atom N550 | Celeron J4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom N550 and Celeron J4025
