Atom S1260 vs Sempron 145

Intel

Atom S1260

2 Cores4 Thrd9 WWMax: 2 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Sempron 145

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Atom S1260 vs Sempron 145 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom S1260 vs Sempron 145 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom S1260 vs Sempron 145: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom S1260

2012

Why buy it

  • +2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 9W instead of 45W, a 36W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Sempron 145

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (544 vs 555).
    • 400% higher power demand at 45W vs 9W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Atom S1260 better than Sempron 145?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Sempron 145 is ahead with 40% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom S1260 pulls ahead with 2% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom S1260 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Atom S1260 still makes the most sense overall. Atom S1260 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2% better PassMark.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom S1260 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Atom S1260 vs Sempron 145 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom S1260

    The Atom S1260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2012 (12 years ago). It is based on the Centerton (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1283. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $64.

    AMD

    Sempron 145

    The Sempron 145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 544 points. Launch price was $95.

    Processing Power

    The Atom S1260 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Sempron 145 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom S1260 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom S1260 versus 2.8 GHz on the Sempron 145 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Sempron 145 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Atom S1260 uses the Centerton (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Sempron 145 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom S1260 scores 555 against the Sempron 145's 544 — a 2% lead for the Atom S1260. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAtom S1260Sempron 145
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4+100%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    2 GHz
    2.8 GHz+40%
    Base Clock
    2 GHz
    2.8 GHz+40%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (per core)
    1 MB (per core)+100%
    Process
    32 nm-29%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Centerton (2012)
    Sargas (2009−2011)
    PassMark
    555+2%
    544
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom S1260 uses the FCBGA1283 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 145 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAtom S1260Sempron 145
    Socket
    FCBGA1283
    AM3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1333
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    8