Atom S1260 vs Celeron SU2300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom S1260 vs Celeron SU2300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom S1260 vs Celeron SU2300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom S1260

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 10W, a 1W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron SU2300

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (545 vs 555).
❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Atom S1260 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom S1260 better than Celeron SU2300?

Yes. Atom S1260 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 1.8% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom S1260 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 1.8% stronger overall PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom S1260 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom S1260 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom S1260 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% higher PassMark. Celeron SU2300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom S1260 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom S1260 vs Celeron SU2300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom S1260

The Atom S1260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2012 (12 years ago). It is based on the Centerton (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1283. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $64.

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom S1260 is built on the Centerton (2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom S1260 scores 555 against the Celeron SU2300's 545 — a 1.8% lead for the Atom S1260. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom S1260 vs 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300.

Feature	Atom S1260	Celeron SU2300
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	—
Boost Clock	2 GHz	—
Base Clock	2 GHz+67%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Centerton (2012)	—
PassMark	555+2%	545

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom S1260 uses the FCBGA1283 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.