Atom Z515 vs Z-01

Intel

Atom Z515

1 Cores1 Thrd650 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Z-01

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Atom Z515 vs Z-01 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z515 vs Z-01: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z515

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (195 vs 215).
    • 10733.3% higher power demand at 650W vs 6W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Z-01 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Z-01

    2011

    Why buy it

    • +10.3% higher PassMark.
    • Draws 6W instead of 650W, a 644W reduction.
    • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
    • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Atom Z515 needs a discrete GPU.

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Atom Z515 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Z-01 better than Atom Z515?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom Z515 is ahead with 20% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Z-01 pulls ahead with 10.3% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Z-01 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Z-01 is the better buy right now. Z-01 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $50 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 10.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Atom Z515 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 20% higher max boost clock. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Z-01 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Atom Z515 vs Z-01 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom Z515

    The Atom Z515 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Silverthorne (2008−2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA441. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.4 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    Z-01

    The Z-01 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Desna (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 215 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Atom Z515 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Z-01 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Z-01 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Atom Z515 versus 1 GHz on the Z-01 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Atom Z515. The Atom Z515 uses the Silverthorne (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Z-01 uses Desna (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z515 scores 195 against the Z-01's 215 — a 9.8% lead for the Z-01. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAtom Z515Z-01
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    2 / 2+100%
    Boost Clock
    1.2 GHz+20%
    1 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (per core)
    1 MB+100%
    Process
    45 nm
    40 nm-11%
    Architecture
    Silverthorne (2008−2010)
    Desna (2011)
    PassMark
    195
    215+10%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    100
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    180
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom Z515 uses the PBGA441 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Z-01 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Atom Z515 versus DDR3-1066 on the Z-01 — the Z-01 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Z-01 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z515) vs 4 (Z-01) — the Z-01 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel US15W (Atom Z515) and Desna (Z-01).

    FeatureAtom Z515Z-01
    Socket
    PBGA441
    FT1
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-533
    DDR3-1066+100%
    Max RAM Capacity
    2 GB
    4 GB+100%
    RAM Channels
    1
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    4
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z515) / AMD-V (Z-01). The Z-01 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Atom Z515 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Z-01 targets Tablet/Netbook.

    FeatureAtom Z515Z-01
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon HD 6250
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Tablet/Netbook