Celeron 2.60 vs Sempron LE-1100

Celeron 2.60 vs Sempron LE-1100 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 2.60

1 / 1

385

+2.4%

376

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2.60 vs Sempron LE-1100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2.60 vs Sempron LE-1100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2.60

2003

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌62.2% higher power demand at 73W vs 45W.

Sempron LE-1100

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 73W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 2.60 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (376 vs 385).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 2.60 better than Sempron LE-1100?

Yes. Celeron 2.60 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 2.60 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2.60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 2.60 is the better buy right now. Celeron 2.60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $53 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron LE-1100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2.60 vs Sempron LE-1100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2.60

The Celeron 2.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $69.

Sempron LE-1100

The Sempron LE-1100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2.60 and Sempron LE-1100 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron 2.60 versus 1.9 GHz on the Sempron LE-1100 — a 31.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.60. The Celeron 2.60 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron LE-1100 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.60 scores 385 against the Sempron LE-1100's 376 — a 2.4% lead for the Celeron 2.60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron 2.60	Sempron LE-1100
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+37%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	128 kB	256 kB+100%
Process	130 nm	65 nm-50%
Architecture	Northwood (2002−2004)	Sparta (2007)
PassMark	385+2%	376

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2.60 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1100 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 2.60	Sempron LE-1100
Socket	PGA478	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-400	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.60) / not specified (Sempron LE-1100). Primary use case: Celeron 2.60 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.60 rivals Pentium 4 2.40.