Celeron 2.70 vs Celeron D 352
Celeron 2.70
Celeron D 352
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.70 is positioned at rank 1025 and the Celeron D 352 is on rank 1062, so the Celeron 2.70 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.70
Performance Per Dollar Celeron D 352
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 2.70 | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cedar Mill (2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 2.70 | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+235%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.70 and Celeron D 352
Celeron 2.70
The Celeron 2.70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron D 352
The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2.70 and Celeron D 352 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron 2.70 versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The Celeron 2.70 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.70 scores 408 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 2.4% lead for the Celeron D 352. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 512 kB+300% |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Northwood (2002−2004) | Cedar Mill (2006) |
| PassMark | 408 | 418+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 180 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 2.70 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron D 352 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR1-400 on the Celeron 2.70 versus 800 on the Celeron D 352 — the Celeron D 352 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 2.70) vs 2 (Celeron D 352). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 845,848,865,875 (Celeron 2.70) and 865G,915,945,965,G31,G41 (Celeron D 352).
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | 800+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+104857500% | 4 |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 2.70) vs false (Celeron D 352). Primary use case: Celeron 2.70 targets Budget, Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.70 rivals Pentium 4 2.80; Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | false |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 2.70 launched at $49 MSRP, while the Celeron D 352 debuted at $69. At current prices ($49 vs $15), the Celeron D 352 is $34 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.70 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 27.9 pts/$ for the Celeron D 352 — making the Celeron D 352 the 108% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Celeron D 352 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-29% | $69 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3 | 27.9+236% |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 2.70 and Celeron D 352
