Celeron 2.70 vs Core Solo T1350
Celeron 2.70
Core Solo T1350
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2.70 is positioned at rank 1025 and the Core Solo T1350 is on rank 1238, so the Celeron 2.70 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2.70
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1350
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron 2.70 | Core Solo T1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($49) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($70) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron 2.70 | Core Solo T1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+44%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($49) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($70) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2.70 and Core Solo T1350
Celeron 2.70
The Celeron 2.70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 128 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 408 points. Launch price was $69.
Core Solo T1350
The Core Solo T1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2.70 and Core Solo T1350 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron 2.70 versus 1.86 GHz on the Core Solo T1350 — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Celeron 2.70. The Celeron 2.70 uses the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Core Solo T1350 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2.70 scores 408 against the Core Solo T1350's 405 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 2.70. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Core Solo T1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+45% | 1.86 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 128 kB | 2 MB+1500% |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Northwood (2002−2004) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 408 | 405 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Core Solo T1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR1-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 2.70) / not specified (Core Solo T1350). Primary use case: Celeron 2.70 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2.70 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Core Solo T1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron 2.70 launched at $49 MSRP, while the Core Solo T1350 debuted at $200. At current prices ($49 vs $70), the Celeron 2.70 is $21 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2.70 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 5.8 pts/$ for the Core Solo T1350 — making the Celeron 2.70 the 36% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 2.70 | Core Solo T1350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $49-76% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-30% | $70 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3+43% | 5.8 |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2006 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 2.70 and Core Solo T1350
