Celeron 2955U vs Celeron B710

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2955U vs Celeron B710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2955U vs Celeron B710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2955U

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Celeron B710

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 2955U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,051 vs 2,069).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Celeron 2955U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 2955U better than Celeron B710?

Yes. Celeron 2955U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 2955U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2955U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 2955U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 2955U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron B710 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2955U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 2955U vs Celeron B710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2955U

The Celeron 2955U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,069 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron B710

The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 2955U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron B710 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 2955U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 2955U versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Celeron B710 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 2955U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron B710 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2955U scores 2,069 against the Celeron B710's 2,051 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron 2955U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2955U vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710.

Feature	Celeron 2955U	Celeron B710
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.6 GHz+14%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	1.6 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+33%	1.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,069	2,051
Geekbench 6 Single	—	231
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	196

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2955U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron B710 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 2955U versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B710 — the Celeron 2955U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Celeron 2955U) vs 16 (Celeron B710) — the Celeron B710 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2955U) and HM65,HM67 (Celeron B710).

Feature	Celeron 2955U	Celeron B710
Socket	FCBGA1168	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	10	16+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2955U) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B710) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2955U targets Budget, Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron 2955U rivals Pentium 2117U; Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 2955U	Celeron B710
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Haswell)	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Laptop