Celeron 2955U vs Phenom II X4 830

Celeron 2955U vs Phenom II X4 830 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 2955U

2 / 2

2,069

0.0%

2,072

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2955U vs Phenom II X4 830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2955U vs Phenom II X4 830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2955U

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Phenom II X4 830 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,069 vs 2,072).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Phenom II X4 830

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2955U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Phenom II X4 830 better than Celeron 2955U?

Yes. Phenom II X4 830 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Phenom II X4 830 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Phenom II X4 830 still makes the most sense overall. Phenom II X4 830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2955U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2955U vs Phenom II X4 830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2955U

The Celeron 2955U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,069 points. Launch price was $69.

Phenom II X4 830

The Phenom II X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,072 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 2955U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 830 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 830 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 2955U versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 830 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 830 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 2955U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2955U scores 2,069 against the Phenom II X4 830's 2,072 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X4 830. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2955U vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 830.

Feature	Celeron 2955U	Phenom II X4 830
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+100%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,069	2,072

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2955U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 830 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 2955U	Phenom II X4 830
Socket	FCBGA1168	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2955U) / not specified (Phenom II X4 830). The Celeron 2955U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Phenom II X4 830 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2955U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2955U rivals Pentium 2117U.