Celeron 2955U vs Xeon E7-8890 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2955U vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2955U vs Xeon E7-8890 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2955U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Xeon E7-8890 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8890 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8890 v4, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌210.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 165W.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+2900% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
✅Draws 165W instead of 512W, a 347W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,054 vs 2,069).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2955U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E7-8890 v4 better than Celeron 2955U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron 2955U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2955U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E7-8890 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E7-8890 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and 2900% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2955U vs Xeon E7-8890 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2955U

The Celeron 2955U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,069 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E7-8890 v4

The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,054 points. Launch price was $7,174.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 2955U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon E7-8890 v4 has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 2955U versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-8890 v4 — a 83.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E7-8890 v4 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron 2955U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2955U scores 2,069 against the Xeon E7-8890 v4's 2,054 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 2955U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2955U vs 60 MB on the Xeon E7-8890 v4.

Feature	Celeron 2955U	Xeon E7-8890 v4
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	24 / 48+1100%
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	3.4 GHz+143%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	2.2 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	60 MB+2900%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	2,069	2,054

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2955U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 2955U	Xeon E7-8890 v4
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2955U) / not specified (Xeon E7-8890 v4). The Celeron 2955U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Xeon E7-8890 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2955U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2955U rivals Pentium 2117U.