Celeron 2957U vs Xeon X3320

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2957U vs Xeon X3320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2957U vs Xeon X3320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2957U

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Xeon X3320 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3320 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,077 vs 2,082).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Xeon X3320

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2957U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X3320 better than Celeron 2957U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3320 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron 2957U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X3320 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X3320 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X3320 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2957U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 2957U vs Xeon X3320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2957U

The Celeron 2957U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $107.

Xeon X3320

The Xeon X3320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,082 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 2957U is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 2957U scores 2,077 against the Xeon X3320's 2,082 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X3320. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 2957U vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3320.

Feature	Celeron 2957U	Xeon X3320
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+79%
L3 Cache	2 MB	6 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	—
PassMark	2,077	2,082
Geekbench 6 Single	284	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2957U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3320 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 2957U	Xeon X3320
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	10	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2957U) / not specified (Xeon X3320). The Celeron 2957U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Xeon X3320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2957U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2957U rivals Pentium 2117U.