Celeron 2970M
VS
A6-6400K

Celeron 2970M vs A6-6400K

Intel

Celeron 2970M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2014
VS
AMD

A6-6400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2970M is positioned at rank 591 and the A6-6400K is on rank 688, so the Celeron 2970M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2970M

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
99%
#579
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
782%
#580
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
770%
#581
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
707%
#582
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
704%
#583
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
698%
#585
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
674%
#586
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
646%
#587
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
645%
#588
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
627%
#591
Celeron 2970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-6400K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12379%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11697%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8493%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2559%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2027%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1773%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1015%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1002%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
913%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
912%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
902%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
878%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
866%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
862%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
854%
#688
A6-6400K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
99%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
98%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
98%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
98%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
98%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
97%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
96%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-6400K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 2970M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 2970MA6-6400K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 2970MA6-6400K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2970M and A6-6400K

Intel

Celeron 2970M

The Celeron 2970M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,501 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

A6-6400K

The A6-6400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,511 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2970M and A6-6400K share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 2970M versus 4.1 GHz on the A6-6400K — a 60.3% clock advantage for the A6-6400K (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Celeron 2970M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A6-6400K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2970M scores 1,501 against the A6-6400K's 1,511 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-6400K. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 2970M vs 0 kB on the A6-6400K.

FeatureCeleron 2970MA6-6400K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
4.1 GHz+86%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.9 GHz+77%
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1024 kB+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,501
1,511
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2970M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A6-6400K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 2970M versus 1866 on the A6-6400K — the A6-6400K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM87,HM86 (Celeron 2970M) and FM2 (A6-6400K).

FeatureCeleron 2970MA6-6400K
Socket
PGA946
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
1866+62100%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+104857500%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-6400K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 2970M) vs true (A6-6400K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2970M) and Radeon HD 8470D (A6-6400K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2970M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2970M rivals Pentium 2020M; A6-6400K rivals Pentium G3258.

FeatureCeleron 2970MA6-6400K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Radeon HD 8470D
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Budget