Celeron 2980U
VS
Core 2 Duo P9600

Celeron 2980U vs Core 2 Duo P9600

Intel

Celeron 2980U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo P9600

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2980U is positioned at rank 392 and the Core 2 Duo P9600 is on rank 609, so the Celeron 2980U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2980U

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
100%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
98%
#380
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
537%
#381
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
529%
#382
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
486%
#383
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
484%
#384
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
479%
#386
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
463%
#387
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
444%
#388
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
443%
#389
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
431%
#392
Celeron 2980U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P9600

#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#597
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
805%
#598
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
794%
#599
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
729%
#600
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
725%
#601
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
719%
#603
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
694%
#604
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
665%
#605
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
664%
#606
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
646%
#609
Core 2 Duo P9600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#622
Athlon II P320
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo P9600 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 2980U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 2980UCore 2 Duo P9600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 2980UCore 2 Duo P9600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2980U and Core 2 Duo P9600

Intel

Celeron 2980U

The Celeron 2980U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,092 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo P9600

The Core 2 Duo P9600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,093 points. Launch price was $348.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2980U and Core 2 Duo P9600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2980U versus 2.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P9600 — a 49.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P9600 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron 2980U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P9600 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2980U scores 1,092 against the Core 2 Duo P9600's 1,093 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo P9600. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2980U vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P9600.

FeatureCeleron 2980UCore 2 Duo P9600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.66 GHz+66%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.66 GHz+66%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
6 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
6 MB+2300%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,092
1,093
Geekbench 6 Single
354
Geekbench 6 Multi
694
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2980U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P9600 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 2980UCore 2 Duo P9600
Socket
FCBGA1168
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2980U) / not specified (Core 2 Duo P9600). The Celeron 2980U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core 2 Duo P9600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2980U targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron 2980U rivals AMD A4-5000.

FeatureCeleron 2980UCore 2 Duo P9600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power