Celeron 3955U
VS
E1-2100

Celeron 3955U vs E1-2100

Intel

Celeron 3955U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2 GHz2015
VS
AMD

E1-2100

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3955U is positioned at rank 616 and the E1-2100 is on rank 719, so the Celeron 3955U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3955U

#604
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
813%
#605
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
801%
#606
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
736%
#607
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
732%
#608
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
726%
#610
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
701%
#611
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
672%
#612
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
671%
#613
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
653%
#616
Celeron 3955U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#622
Athlon II P320
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1-2100

#706
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1022%
#707
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1007%
#708
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
925%
#709
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
921%
#710
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
912%
#712
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
881%
#713
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
845%
#714
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
843%
#715
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
821%
#719
E1-2100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 3955U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E1-2100 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 3955UE1-2100
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 3955UE1-2100
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3955U and E1-2100

Intel

Celeron 3955U

The Celeron 3955U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,443 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

E1-2100

The E1-2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,435 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3955U and E1-2100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 3955U versus 1 GHz on the E1-2100 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Celeron 3955U. The Celeron 3955U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the E1-2100 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3955U scores 1,443 against the E1-2100's 1,435 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 3955U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3955U vs 0 kB on the E1-2100.

FeatureCeleron 3955UE1-2100
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz+100%
1 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1024 kB+100%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,443
1,435
Geekbench 6 Single
431
Geekbench 6 Multi
741
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3955U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E1-2100 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 3955UE1-2100
Socket
BGA1356
FT3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3955U) / not specified (E1-2100). The Celeron 3955U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the E1-2100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3955U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3955U rivals Pentium 3825U.

FeatureCeleron 3955UE1-2100
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget