Celeron 3955U
VS
Phenom X3 8750

Celeron 3955U vs Phenom X3 8750

Intel

Celeron 3955U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2 GHz2015
VS
AMD

Phenom X3 8750

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3955U is positioned at rank 616 and the Phenom X3 8750 is on rank 1043, so the Celeron 3955U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3955U

#604
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
813%
#605
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
801%
#606
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
736%
#607
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
732%
#608
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
726%
#610
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
701%
#611
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
672%
#612
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
671%
#613
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
653%
#616
Celeron 3955U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#622
Athlon II P320
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X3 8750

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
42067%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
39749%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28861%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8695%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6887%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6025%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3451%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3406%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3101%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3101%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3066%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2983%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2942%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2930%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2903%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
100%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
99%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
98%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
96%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
95%
#1048
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
95%
#1049
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
94%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
93%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
92%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
92%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
92%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
91%
#1055
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
89%
#1056
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
89%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
89%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3955U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 3955UPhenom X3 8750
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Toliman (2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X3 8750 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 3955UPhenom X3 8750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3955U and Phenom X3 8750

Intel

Celeron 3955U

The Celeron 3955U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,443 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

Phenom X3 8750

The Phenom X3 8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron 3955U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8750 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 3955U versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X3 8750 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Phenom X3 8750. The Celeron 3955U uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3955U scores 1,443 against the Phenom X3 8750's 1,445 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom X3 8750. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 3955U vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8750.

FeatureCeleron 3955UPhenom X3 8750
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Toliman (2008)
PassMark
1,443
1,445
Geekbench 6 Single
431
Geekbench 6 Multi
741
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3955U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 3955UPhenom X3 8750
Socket
BGA1356
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3955U) / not specified (Phenom X3 8750). The Celeron 3955U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Phenom X3 8750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3955U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3955U rivals Pentium 3825U.

FeatureCeleron 3955UPhenom X3 8750
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget