Celeron 5305U
VS
Core i5-13400F

Celeron 5305U vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Celeron 5305U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 5305U is positioned at rank #656 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 5305U

#644
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
898%
#645
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
885%
#646
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
812%
#647
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
808%
#648
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
801%
#650
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
774%
#651
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
742%
#652
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
741%
#653
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
721%
#656
Celeron 5305U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
99%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F

#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
107%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
107%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
106%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
106%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
105%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
105%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
104%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
104%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
104%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
76%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
104%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
103%
#77
Ryzen 9 5900XT
MSRP: $349|Avg: $311
102%
#78
Core i5-12500
MSRP: $212|Avg: $140
101%
#79
Core i5-14600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $275
101%
#80
Ryzen 7 7700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $246
101%
#81
Core i5-13400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $180
100%
#82
Core i3-12100T
MSRP: $125|Avg: $90
100%
#83
Core i7-11700F
MSRP: $298|Avg: $150
100%
#84
Core i3-10105F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $65
99%
#85
Core i5-9400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
98%
#86
Core i7-12700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
98%
#87
Core i5-12490F
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#88
Ryzen 5 5600GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $150
97%
#89
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#90
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
97%
#91
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
96%
#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
96%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
94%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
94%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-13400F delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 5305U in both compute-intensive tasks (180.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 5305UCore i5-13400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 5305UCore i5-13400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 5305U and Core i5-13400F

Intel

Celeron 5305U

The Celeron 5305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,307 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Celeron 5305U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 5305U versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron 5305U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 5305U scores 1,307 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 180.1% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 480 vs 2,407, a 133.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 865 vs 11,408 (171.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 5305U vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCeleron 5305UCore i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
4.6 GHz+100%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
2 MB
20 MB (total)+900%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
1,307
25,029+1815%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
480
2,407+401%
Geekbench 6 Multi
865
11,408+1219%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 5305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron 5305U versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 5305U) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Comet Lake-U (Celeron 5305U) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

FeatureCeleron 5305UCore i5-13400F
Socket
FCBGA1528
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
192 GB+200%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
20+67%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Celeron 5305U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5305U targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron 5305U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCeleron 5305UCore i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Gaming