Celeron 5305U vs Pentium E5200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 5305U vs Pentium E5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 5305U vs Pentium E5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 5305U

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (Comet Lake), while Pentium E5200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,307 vs 1,315).

Pentium E5200

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Celeron 5305U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 5305U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5200 better than Celeron 5305U?

Yes. Pentium E5200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 34 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5200 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $84 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 5305U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 5305U vs Pentium E5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 5305U

The Celeron 5305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,307 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E5200

The Pentium E5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Agosto 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,315 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 5305U and Pentium E5200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron 5305U versus 2.5 GHz on the Pentium E5200 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Pentium E5200 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron 5305U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E5200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 5305U scores 1,307 against the Pentium E5200's 1,315 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium E5200. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 5305U vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5200.

Feature	Celeron 5305U	Pentium E5200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,307	1,315
Geekbench 6 Single	480	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	865	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 5305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 5305U	Pentium E5200
Socket	FCBGA1528	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5305U) / not specified (Pentium E5200). The Celeron 5305U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Pentium E5200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5305U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5305U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.