Celeron 5305U vs Xeon E3110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 5305U vs Xeon E3110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 5305U vs Xeon E3110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 5305U

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (Comet Lake), while Xeon E3110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 6 MB).

Xeon E3110

2008

Why buy it

✅+200% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,295 vs 1,307).
❌Launch MSRP is still $214 MSRP, while Celeron 5305U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 5305U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 5305U better than Xeon E3110?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron 5305U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 5305U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 5305U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 5305U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3110 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Celeron 5305U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $214 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3110 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 5305U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 5305U vs Xeon E3110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 5305U

The Celeron 5305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,307 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E3110

The Xeon E3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 5305U is built on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 5305U scores 1,307 against the Xeon E3110's 1,295 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron 5305U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 5305U vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E3110.

Feature	Celeron 5305U	Xeon E3110
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	2 MB	6 MB L2 Cache+200%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	—
PassMark	1,307	1,295
Geekbench 6 Single	480	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	865	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 5305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3110 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 5305U	Xeon E3110
Socket	FCBGA1528	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5305U) / not specified (Xeon E3110). The Celeron 5305U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Xeon E3110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5305U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5305U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.