PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 867 vs Pentium D 915 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 867 vs Pentium D 915: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 867

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 17W instead of 95W, a 78W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium D 915 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $74 MSRP).

Pentium D 915

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($74 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 8.8 PassMark/$ ($74 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 867 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (705 vs 755).
❌458.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 867 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 867 better than Pentium D 915?

Yes. Celeron 867 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 867 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 867 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 867 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 867 comes in 16.2% more expensive on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $74 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium D 915 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 8.5% better value on paper (9.5 vs 8.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 867 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 867 vs Pentium D 915 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 867

The Celeron 867 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 755 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium D 915

The Pentium D 915 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 July 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $74.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 867 and Pentium D 915 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Celeron 867 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium D 915 — a 73.2% clock advantage for the Pentium D 915 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 867 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium D 915 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 867 scores 755 against the Pentium D 915's 705 — a 6.8% lead for the Celeron 867. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 867 vs 0 kB on the Pentium D 915.

Feature	Celeron 867	Pentium D 915
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	2.8 GHz+115%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.8 GHz+115%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	755+7%	705

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 867 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium D 915 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 867	Pentium D 915
Socket	BGA1023	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 867) / not specified (Pentium D 915). The Celeron 867 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium D 915 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 867 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 867 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 867	Pentium D 915
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 867 was priced at $86, while the Pentium D 915 came in at $74. On launch pricing ($86 vs $74), Pentium D 915 was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 867 delivers 8.8 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Pentium D 915 — making the Pentium D 915 the 8.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 867	Pentium D 915
MSRP	$86	$74-14%
Performance per Dollar	8.8	9.5+8%
Release Date	2012	2006

Search Celeron 867 on Amazon

Search Pentium D 915 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.