Celeron 867 vs Pentium T2370

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 867 vs Pentium T2370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 867 vs Pentium T2370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 867

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium T2370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T2370

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (745 vs 755).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 867 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 867 better than Pentium T2370?

Yes. Celeron 867 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 867 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 867 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 867 is the better buy right now. Celeron 867 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $86 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1.3% better value on MSRP (8.8 vs 8.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 867 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 867 vs Pentium T2370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 867

The Celeron 867 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 755 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium T2370

The Pentium T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 745 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 867 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 867 scores 755 against the Pentium T2370's 745 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron 867. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 867 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2370.

Feature	Celeron 867	Pentium T2370
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.3 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	1.73 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	755+1%	745

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 867 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T2370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 867	Pentium T2370
Socket	BGA1023	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 867) / not specified (Pentium T2370). The Celeron 867 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium T2370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 867 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 867 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 867	Pentium T2370
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 867 was priced at $86, while the Pentium T2370 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($86 vs $86), Pentium T2370 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 867 delivers 8.8 pts/$ vs 8.7 pts/$ for the Pentium T2370 — making the Celeron 867 the 1.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 867	Pentium T2370
MSRP	$86	$86
Performance per Dollar	8.8+1%	8.7
Release Date	2012	2008

Search Celeron 867 on Amazon

Search Pentium T2370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.