Celeron B820
VS
Pentium U5600

Celeron B820 vs Pentium U5600

Intel

Celeron B820

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Pentium U5600

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B820 is positioned at rank 1109 and the Pentium U5600 is on rank 1122, so the Celeron B820 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B820

#1097
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3297%
#1098
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3248%
#1099
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2982%
#1100
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2969%
#1101
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2941%
#1103
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2840%
#1104
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2724%
#1105
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2719%
#1106
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2646%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
99%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
98%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
97%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
96%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
94%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium U5600

#1110
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3514%
#1111
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3462%
#1112
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3178%
#1113
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3164%
#1114
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3135%
#1116
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3028%
#1117
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2903%
#1118
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2898%
#1119
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2820%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#1124
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
98%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
98%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron B820 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium U5600 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 8.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron B820Pentium U5600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron B820 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 70% cheaper ($15 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron B820Pentium U5600
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+205%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B820 and Pentium U5600

Intel

Celeron B820

The Celeron B820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Pentium U5600

The Pentium U5600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 835 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B820 and Pentium U5600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B820 versus 1.33 GHz on the Pentium U5600 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Celeron B820 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Celeron B820 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium U5600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B820 scores 765 against the Pentium U5600's 835 — a 8.8% lead for the Pentium U5600. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B820 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium U5600.

FeatureCeleron B820Pentium U5600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz+28%
1.33 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz+28%
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
765
835+9%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B820 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium U5600 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron B820Pentium U5600
Socket
PGA988
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron B820) / not specified (Pentium U5600). The Celeron B820 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium U5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B820 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B820 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron B820Pentium U5600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron B820 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Pentium U5600 debuted at $100. At current prices ($15 vs $50), the Celeron B820 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B820 delivers 51.0 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Pentium U5600 — making the Celeron B820 the 101.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron B820Pentium U5600
MSRP
$86-14%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$15-70%
$50
Performance per Dollar
51.0+205%
16.7
Release Date
2012
2011