PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B840 vs Celeron G530T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B840 vs Celeron G530T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B840

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 21.1 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G530T.

Celeron G530T

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $36 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 70.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Celeron B840.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron B840 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (655 vs 790).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B840 better than Celeron G530T?

Yes. Celeron B840 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 20.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.9% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron B840 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B840 is the stronger fit. You are getting 20.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B840 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron B840 comes in 72.0% more expensive on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G530T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 70.5% better value on paper (21.1 vs 12.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B840 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B840 vs Celeron G530T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B840

The Celeron B840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,065 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron G530T

The Celeron G530T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B840 and Celeron G530T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron B840 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron G530T — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G530T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron B840 scores 1,065 against the Celeron G530T's 1,056 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron B840. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 384, a 15.8% lead for the Celeron B840 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 790 vs 655 (18.7% advantage for the Celeron B840). Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron B840	Celeron G530T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2 GHz+5%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,065	1,056
Geekbench 6 Single	450+17%	384
Geekbench 6 Multi	790+21%	655

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B840 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G530T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. The Celeron G530T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67 (Celeron B840) and H61,H67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G530T).

Feature	Celeron B840	Celeron G530T
Socket	PGA988	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron B840) vs VT-x (Celeron G530T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B840) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G530T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B840 targets Budget, Celeron G530T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron B840 rivals Pentium B940; Celeron G530T rivals Pentium G630T.

Feature	Celeron B840	Celeron G530T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B840 was priced at $86, while the Celeron G530T came in at $50. On launch pricing ($86 vs $50), Celeron G530T was $36 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B840 delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 21.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G530T — making the Celeron G530T the 52.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B840	Celeron G530T
MSRP	$86	$50-42%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	21.1+70%
Release Date	2011	2011

Search Celeron B840 on Amazon

Search Celeron G530T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.