Celeron B840
VS
Celeron N2820

Celeron B840 vs Celeron N2820

Intel

Celeron B840

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron N2820

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.39 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B840 is positioned at rank 1028 and the Celeron N2820 is on rank 259, so the Celeron N2820 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B840

#1016
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2370%
#1017
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2335%
#1018
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2144%
#1019
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2134%
#1020
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2115%
#1022
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2042%
#1023
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1958%
#1024
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1955%
#1025
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1902%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
99%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
93%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2820

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#247
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
415%
#248
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
409%
#249
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
375%
#250
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
374%
#251
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
370%
#253
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
357%
#254
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
343%
#255
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
342%
#256
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
333%
#259
Celeron N2820
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron B840 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron N2820 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron B840Celeron N2820
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron B840Celeron N2820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B840 and Celeron N2820

Intel

Celeron B840

The Celeron B840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,065 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Celeron N2820

The Celeron N2820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,061 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B840 and Celeron N2820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron B840 versus 2.39 GHz on the Celeron N2820 — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N2820 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron B840 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N2820 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B840 scores 1,065 against the Celeron N2820's 1,061 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron B840. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 220, a 68.7% lead for the Celeron B840 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 790 vs 400 (65.5% advantage for the Celeron B840). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B840 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2820.

FeatureCeleron B840Celeron N2820
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.39 GHz+26%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.13 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,065
1,061
Geekbench 6 Single
450+105%
220
Geekbench 6 Multi
790+98%
400
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B840 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2820 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Celeron B840 versus DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2820 — the Celeron B840 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B840 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B840) vs 4 (Celeron N2820) — the Celeron B840 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67 (Celeron B840) and SoC (Celeron N2820).

FeatureCeleron B840Celeron N2820
Socket
PGA988
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333+44333%
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16
8 GB+52428700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron B840) vs VT-x (Celeron N2820). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B840) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2820) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B840 targets Budget, Celeron N2820 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron B840 rivals Pentium B940; Celeron N2820 rivals AMD A6-6310.

FeatureCeleron B840Celeron N2820
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Netbook