Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium G4560T

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1600

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G4560T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium G4560T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium G4560T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium G4560T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600

2008

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 46.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G4560T

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $86 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 133.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.8 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,994 vs 3,000).
  • 3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G4560T better than Celeron Dual-Core T1600?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G4560T is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1600 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium G4560T is the better buy right now. Pentium G4560T comes in $86 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 133.9% better value on MSRP (46.8 vs 20.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium G4560T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium G4560T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T1600

The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.66 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,000 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium G4560T

The Pentium G4560T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,994 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium G4560T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 versus 2.9 GHz on the Pentium G4560T — a 54.4% clock advantage for the Pentium G4560T. The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium G4560T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 scores 3,000 against the Pentium G4560T's 2,994 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1600.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1600Pentium G4560T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.66 GHz
2.9 GHz+75%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB
256K (per core)+25500%
Process
65 nm
14 nm-78%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,000
2,994
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G4560T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1600Pentium G4560T
Socket
PGA478
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
667
Max RAM Capacity
4
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron Dual-Core T1600) / not specified (Pentium G4560T). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1600 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1600 rivals Pentium T2390.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1600Pentium G4560T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 was priced at $150, while the Pentium G4560T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($150 vs $64), Pentium G4560T was $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 delivers 20.0 pts/$ vs 46.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G4560T — making the Pentium G4560T the 80.2% better value option.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T1600Pentium G4560T
MSRP
$150
$64-57%
Performance per Dollar
20.0
46.8+134%
Release Date
2008
2017

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.