
Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Pentium Silver N6000
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium Silver N6000 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium Silver N6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium Silver N6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
2008Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 1W instead of 6W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Pentium Silver N6000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Pentium Silver N6000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Pentium Silver N6000
2021Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (32 EU), while Celeron Dual-Core T1600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron Dual-Core T1600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,989 vs 3,000).
- β500% higher power demand at 6W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron Dual-Core T1600 better than Pentium Silver N6000?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Pentium Silver N6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600
The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006β2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.66 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,000 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium Silver N6000
The Pentium Silver N6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,989 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium Silver N6000 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β the Pentium Silver N6000 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.66 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 versus 3.3 GHz on the Pentium Silver N6000 β a 66.1% clock advantage for the Pentium Silver N6000. The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses the Merom (2006β2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium Silver N6000 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 scores 3,000 against the Pentium Silver N6000's 2,989 β a 0.4% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1600.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 | Pentium Silver N6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.66 GHz | 3.3 GHz+99% |
| Base Clock | β | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB (total)+50% |
| Process | 65 nm | 10 nm-85% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006β2008) | Jasper Lake (2021) |
| PassMark | 3,000 | 2,989 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 1,911 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 473 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 1,090 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron Dual-Core T1600 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium Silver N6000 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 versus DDR4-2933 on the Pentium Silver N6000 β the Pentium Silver N6000 supports 339.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium Silver N6000 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T1600) vs 8 (Pentium Silver N6000) β the Pentium Silver N6000 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45,GM47,PM45 (Celeron Dual-Core T1600) and SoC (Pentium Silver N6000).
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 | Pentium Silver N6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | BGA1338 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | 667 | DDR4-2933+340% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 8 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron Dual-Core T1600) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Pentium Silver N6000). The Pentium Silver N6000 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (32 EU)), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1600 targets Budget, Pentium Silver N6000 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1600 rivals Pentium T2390; Pentium Silver N6000 rivals Celeron N5105.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1600 | Pentium Silver N6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | UHD Graphics (32 EU) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | false | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













