Celeron Dual-Core T1700 vs Celeron T3500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 vs Celeron T3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 vs Celeron T3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron T3500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 1,058).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Celeron Dual-Core T1700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T1700 better than Celeron T3500?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron Dual-Core T1700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron T3500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (13.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron T3500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 vs Celeron T3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

The Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.83 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron T3500

The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is built on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 scores 1,058 against the Celeron T3500's 1,055 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1700.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1700	Celeron T3500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.83 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Merom (2006−2008)	—
PassMark	1,058	1,055

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T1700	Celeron T3500
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1700) / not specified (Celeron T3500). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1700 rivals Pentium T2390.