Atom Z2560 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z2560 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z2560 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z2560

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with PowerVR SGX544MP2, while Celeron Dual-Core T1700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,056 vs 1,058).
❌200% higher power demand at 3W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 3W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z2560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T1700 better than Atom Z2560?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T1700 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron Dual-Core T1700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z2560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z2560 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z2560

The Atom Z2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

The Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.83 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z2560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron Dual-Core T1700's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom Z2560 versus 1.83 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T1700. The Atom Z2560 uses the Clovertrail (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2560 scores 1,056 against the Celeron Dual-Core T1700's 1,058 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T1700.

Feature	Atom Z2560	Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.83 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Clovertrail (2013)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,056	1,058

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2560 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR2-1066 on the Atom Z2560 versus DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 — the Atom Z2560 supports 59.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron Dual-Core T1700 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom Z2560) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron Dual-Core T1700).

Feature	Atom Z2560	Celeron Dual-Core T1700
Socket	FC-MB4760	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR2-1066+60%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z2560) / No (Celeron Dual-Core T1700). The Atom Z2560 includes integrated graphics (PowerVR SGX544MP2), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1700 rivals Pentium T2390.