A6-1450 vs Atom Z2560

A6-1450 vs Atom Z2560 Performance Spectrum

A6-1450

4 / 4

1,062

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom Z2560

2 / 4

1,056

0.0%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-1450 vs Atom Z2560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-1450 vs Atom Z2560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-1450

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 8W vs 3W.

Atom Z2560

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 8W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-1450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,056 vs 1,062).

Quick Answers

So, is A6-1450 better than Atom Z2560?

Yes. A6-1450 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-1450 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-1450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-1450 still makes the most sense overall. A6-1450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-1450 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-1450 vs Atom Z2560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-1450

The A6-1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Atom Z2560

The Atom Z2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-1450 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom Z2560 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-1450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the A6-1450 versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom Z2560 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Atom Z2560. The A6-1450 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom Z2560 uses Clovertrail (2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-1450 scores 1,062 against the Atom Z2560's 1,056 — a 0.6% lead for the A6-1450. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-1450	Atom Z2560
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.6 GHz+14%
Base Clock	1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Clovertrail (2013)
PassMark	1,062	1,056
Geekbench 6 Single	144	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-1450 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom Z2560 uses FC-MB4760 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. The A6-1450 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-1450) vs 2 (Atom Z2560). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-1450) vs 0 (Atom Z2560) — the A6-1450 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A6-1450) and Intel BGA1264 (Atom Z2560).

Feature	A6-1450	Atom Z2560
Socket	FT3	FC-MB4760
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	LPDDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-1450) / not specified (Atom Z2560). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8250 (A6-1450) and PowerVR SGX544MP2 (Atom Z2560) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-1450 targets Low Power Tablet/Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-1450 rivals Atom Z3740.