A6-1450
VS
Celeron G530T

A6-1450 vs Celeron G530T

AMD

A6-1450

4 Cores4 Thrd8 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G530T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-1450 is positioned at rank 929 and the Celeron G530T is on rank 769, so the Celeron G530T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-1450

#917
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1658%
#918
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1633%
#919
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1499%
#920
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1493%
#921
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1479%
#923
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1428%
#924
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1369%
#925
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1367%
#926
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1331%
#929
A6-1450
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
96%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G530T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14759%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13946%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10126%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3051%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2416%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2114%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1211%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1195%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1088%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1088%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1076%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1047%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1032%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1028%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1019%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
99%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
100%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
100%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
100%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
100%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
99%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
99%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
99%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
99%
#778
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#779
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
99%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
98%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
98%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G530T leads in gaming performance. However, the A6-1450 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-1450Celeron G530T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($17)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-1450Celeron G530T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($17)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-1450 and Celeron G530T

AMD

A6-1450

The A6-1450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,062 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron G530T

The Celeron G530T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A6-1450 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G530T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-1450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the A6-1450 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron G530T — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G530T (base: 1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-1450 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G530T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-1450 scores 1,062 against the Celeron G530T's 1,056 — a 0.6% lead for the A6-1450. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 144 vs 384, a 90.9% lead for the Celeron G530T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 655 (37.1% advantage for the Celeron G530T). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-1450 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530T.

FeatureA6-1450Celeron G530T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2 GHz+43%
Base Clock
1 GHz
2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Temash (2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,062
1,056
Geekbench 6 Single
144
384+167%
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
655+46%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-1450 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G530T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G530T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-1450) vs 2 (Celeron G530T). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-1450) vs 16 (Celeron G530T) — the Celeron G530T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (A6-1450) and H61,H67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G530T).

FeatureA6-1450Celeron G530T
Socket
FT3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-1450) vs VT-x (Celeron G530T). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8250 (A6-1450) and Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G530T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-1450 targets Low Power Tablet/Laptop, Celeron G530T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-1450 rivals Atom Z3740; Celeron G530T rivals Pentium G630T.

FeatureA6-1450Celeron G530T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8250
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power Tablet/Laptop
Desktop