Atom Z2560 vs E-450

Intel

Atom Z2560

2 Cores4 Thrd3 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

E-450

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.65 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Atom Z2560 vs E-450 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z2560 vs E-450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z2560

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 3W instead of 18W, a 15W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with PowerVR SGX544MP2, while E-450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E-450 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,056 vs 1,063).

E-450

2011

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • 500% higher power demand at 18W vs 3W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Atom Z2560 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E-450 better than Atom Z2560?
Yes. E-450 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, E-450 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E-450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
E-450 still makes the most sense overall. E-450 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom Z2560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z2560 vs E-450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom Z2560

The Atom Z2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Clovertrail (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

E-450

The E-450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.65 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,063 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Atom Z2560 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E-450's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom Z2560 versus 1.65 GHz on the E-450 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the E-450. The Atom Z2560 uses the Clovertrail (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E-450 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2560 scores 1,056 against the E-450's 1,063 — a 0.7% lead for the E-450. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom Z2560E-450
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
1.65 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm-20%
40 nm
Architecture
Clovertrail (2013)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,056
1,063
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2560 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E-450 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom Z2560E-450
Socket
FC-MB4760
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z2560 includes integrated graphics (PowerVR SGX544MP2), while the E-450 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom Z2560E-450
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
PowerVR SGX544MP2