Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs Celeron G1840

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs Celeron G1840 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs Celeron G1840: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 50W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.5 vs 51.0 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1840 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G1840

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $45 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 126.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.0 vs 22.5 PassMark/$ ($35 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Celeron Dual-Core T3000 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,784 vs 1,797).
❌4900% higher power demand at 50W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1840 better than Celeron Dual-Core T3000?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1840 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3000 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1840 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1840 comes in $45 cheaper on MSRP at $35 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. It is also 126.9% better value on MSRP (51.0 vs 22.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1840 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000 vs Celeron G1840 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000

The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn-1M (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,797 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Celeron G1840 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840. The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 uses the Penryn-1M (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G1840 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 scores 1,797 against the Celeron G1840's 1,784 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3000.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3000	Celeron G1840
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock	—	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn-1M (2009)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,797	1,784
Geekbench 6 Single	—	488
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	832

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G1840 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1840 — the Celeron G1840 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1840 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile Intel 4 Series (Celeron Dual-Core T3000) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3000	Celeron G1840
Socket	P	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	DDR3-1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron Dual-Core T3000) vs VT-x (Celeron G1840). The Celeron G1840 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3000	Celeron G1840
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	false	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 was priced at $80, while the Celeron G1840 came in at $35. On launch pricing ($80 vs $35), Celeron G1840 was $45 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 delivers 22.5 pts/$ vs 51.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G1840 — making the Celeron G1840 the 77.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3000	Celeron G1840
MSRP	$80	$35-56%
Performance per Dollar	22.5	51.0+127%
Release Date	2009	2014

Search Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on Amazon

Search Celeron G1840 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.