Athlon 5350 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Athlon 5350 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 5350

4 / 4

1,796

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core T3000

2 / 2

1,797

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 5350 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 5350 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 5350

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 45.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 22.5 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3 Graphics, while Celeron Dual-Core T3000 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron Dual-Core T3000.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,796 vs 1,797).
❌2400% higher power demand at 25W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 25W, a 24W reduction.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.5 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5350.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 5350 better than Celeron Dual-Core T3000?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 5350 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3000 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 5350 is the better buy right now. Athlon 5350 comes in $25 cheaper on MSRP at $55 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 45.4% better value on MSRP (32.7 vs 22.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 5350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 5350 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5350

The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000

The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn-1M (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,797 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 5350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 — a 13% clock advantage for the Athlon 5350. The Athlon 5350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 uses Penryn-1M (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5350 scores 1,796 against the Celeron Dual-Core T3000's 1,797 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3000.

Feature	Athlon 5350	Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.05 GHz+14%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.05 GHz	—
L2 Cache	2048 kB+100%	1 MB
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Penryn-1M (2009)
PassMark	1,796	1,797
Geekbench 6 Single	223	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	708	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 5350 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Athlon 5350 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 — the Athlon 5350 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5350 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5350) vs 2 (Celeron Dual-Core T3000). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 5350) vs 16 (Celeron Dual-Core T3000) — the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1 (Athlon 5350) and Mobile Intel 4 Series (Celeron Dual-Core T3000).

Feature	Athlon 5350	Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Socket	AM1	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1600+100%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon 5350) vs false (Celeron Dual-Core T3000). The Athlon 5350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.

Feature	Athlon 5350	Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R3 Graphics	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	false

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 5350 was priced at $55, while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($55 vs $80), Athlon 5350 was $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5350 delivers 32.7 pts/$ vs 22.5 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 — making the Athlon 5350 the 37% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 5350	Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP	$55-31%	$80
Performance per Dollar	32.7+45%	22.5
Release Date	2014	2009

Search Athlon 5350 on Amazon

Search Celeron Dual-Core T3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.