
Athlon 5350 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Athlon 5350

Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 5350 is positioned at rank 564 and the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is on rank 824, so the Athlon 5350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 5350
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 5350 | Celeron Dual-Core T3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn-1M (2009) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 5350 | Celeron Dual-Core T3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+0%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 5350 and Celeron Dual-Core T3000

Athlon 5350
The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron Dual-Core T3000
The Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn-1M (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,797 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 5350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 — a 13% clock advantage for the Athlon 5350. The Athlon 5350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 uses Penryn-1M (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5350 scores 1,796 against the Celeron Dual-Core T3000's 1,797 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3000.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Celeron Dual-Core T3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.05 GHz+14% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.05 GHz | — |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Penryn-1M (2009) |
| PassMark | 1,796 | 1,797 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 223 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 708 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 5350 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Athlon 5350 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 — the Athlon 5350 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5350 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5350) vs 2 (Celeron Dual-Core T3000). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 5350) vs 16 (Celeron Dual-Core T3000) — the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM1 (Athlon 5350) and Mobile Intel 4 Series (Celeron Dual-Core T3000).
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Celeron Dual-Core T3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM1 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+53233% | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 8 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon 5350) vs false (Celeron Dual-Core T3000). The Athlon 5350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Celeron Dual-Core T3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | false |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 5350 launched at $55 MSRP, while the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 debuted at $80. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 5350 delivers 119.7 pts/$ vs 119.8 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T3000 the 0.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Celeron Dual-Core T3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $55-31% | $80 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 119.7 | 119.8 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














