
Athlon 5350

Core 2 Duo T9500
Athlon 5350 vs Core 2 Duo T9500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 5350 vs Core 2 Duo T9500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 5350 vs Core 2 Duo T9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 5350
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3 Graphics, while Core 2 Duo T9500 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Duo T9500.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,796 vs 1,799).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T9500 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌316.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 6W.
Core 2 Duo T9500
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 25W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 5350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 5350.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo T9500 better than Athlon 5350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 5350 vs Core 2 Duo T9500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 5350
The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

Core 2 Duo T9500
The Core 2 Duo T9500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $530.
Processing Power
The Athlon 5350 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T9500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9500 — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9500 (base: 2.05 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Athlon 5350 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 5350 scores 1,796 against the Core 2 Duo T9500's 1,799 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9500.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.05 GHz | 2.6 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.05 GHz | 2.6 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 6 MB+200% |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,796 | 1,799 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 223 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 708 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 5350 uses the AM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Athlon 5350 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T9500 — the Athlon 5350 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 5350) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo T9500). Chipset compatibility: AM1 (Athlon 5350) and GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T9500).
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+50% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon 5350) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9500). The Athlon 5350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900; Core 2 Duo T9500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | Athlon 5350 | Core 2 Duo T9500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















