A6-7480 vs Athlon 5350

A6-7480 vs Athlon 5350 Performance Spectrum

A6-7480

2 / 2

1,793

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 5350

4 / 4

1,796

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7480 vs Athlon 5350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7480 vs Athlon 5350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7480

2018

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,793 vs 1,796).
❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.

Athlon 5350

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $55 MSRP, while A6-7480 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 5350 better than A6-7480?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-7480 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5350 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 5350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 5350 is the better buy right now. Athlon 5350 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $55 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6-7480 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (32.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7480 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-7480 vs Athlon 5350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7480

The A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,793 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon 5350

The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7480 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon 5350 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-7480 versus 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 — a 59.8% clock advantage for the A6-7480 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.05 GHz). The A6-7480 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon 5350 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7480 scores 1,793 against the Athlon 5350's 1,796 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon 5350.

Feature	A6-7480	Athlon 5350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+85%	2.05 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+71%	2.05 GHz
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	2048 kB+100%
Process	28 nm	28 nm
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,793	1,796
Geekbench 6 Single	—	223
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	708

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7480 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 5350 uses AM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7480 versus 1600 on the Athlon 5350 — the A6-7480 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7480 supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A6-7480) vs 1 (Athlon 5350). PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7480) vs 8 (Athlon 5350) — the A6-7480 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7480) and AM1 (Athlon 5350).

Feature	A6-7480	Athlon 5350
Socket	FM2+	AM1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+33%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	32+100%	16
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-7480) and Radeon R3 Graphics (Athlon 5350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7480 rivals Pentium G4400; Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.