A6-7480 vs Athlon II X4 600e

A6-7480 vs Athlon II X4 600e Performance Spectrum

A6-7480

2 / 2

1,793

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X4 600e

4 / 4

1,795

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7480 vs Athlon II X4 600e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7480 vs Athlon II X4 600e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7480

2018

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Athlon II X4 600e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,793 vs 1,795).

Athlon II X4 600e

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A6-7480 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7480 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X4 600e better than A6-7480?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-7480 is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 32 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 600e pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 600e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X4 600e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X4 600e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6-7480 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 32 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7480 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-7480 vs Athlon II X4 600e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7480

The A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,793 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon II X4 600e

The Athlon II X4 600e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,795 points. Launch price was $130.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7480 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X4 600e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 600e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-7480 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II X4 600e — a 53.3% clock advantage for the A6-7480 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A6-7480 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X4 600e uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7480 scores 1,793 against the Athlon II X4 600e's 1,795 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II X4 600e.

Feature	A6-7480	Athlon II X4 600e
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+73%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,793	1,795

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7480 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 600e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7480 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 600e — the A6-7480 supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7480 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7480) and Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 600e).

Feature	A6-7480	Athlon II X4 600e
Socket	FM2+	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7480) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X4 600e). The A6-7480 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon II X4 600e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7480 rivals Pentium G4400.