A6-7480 vs Core i3-4000M

A6-7480 vs Core i3-4000M Performance Spectrum

A6-7480

2 / 2

1,793

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4000M

2 / 4

1,797

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7480 vs Core i3-4000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7480 vs Core i3-4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7480

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Core i3-4000M needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-4000M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,793 vs 1,797).

Core i3-4000M

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7480 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-7480.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7480 better than Core i3-4000M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-7480 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4000M pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4000M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7480 still makes the most sense overall. A6-7480 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7480 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-7480 vs Core i3-4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7480

The A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,793 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-4000M

The Core i3-4000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,797 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-7480 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4000M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-7480 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-4000M — a 45.2% clock advantage for the A6-7480 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A6-7480 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4000M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7480 scores 1,793 against the Core i3-4000M's 1,797 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-4000M.

Feature	A6-7480	Core i3-4000M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+58%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+46%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,793	1,797

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7480 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4000M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-7480	Core i3-4000M
Socket	FM2+	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A6-7480) / not specified (Core i3-4000M). The A6-7480 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core i3-4000M requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7480 rivals Pentium G4400.