A6-7480 vs Core 2 Duo T9500

A6-7480 vs Core 2 Duo T9500 Performance Spectrum

A6-7480

2 / 2

1,793

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T9500

2 / 2

1,799

+0.3%

Pentium E5400

Celeron M U3400

Pentium M 725

Pentium Dual Core T2370

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7480 vs Core 2 Duo T9500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7480 vs Core 2 Duo T9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7480

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Core 2 Duo T9500 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core 2 Duo T9500.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,793 vs 1,799).
❌650% higher power demand at 45W vs 6W.

Core 2 Duo T9500

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 45W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7480 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-7480.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T9500 better than A6-7480?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-7480 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9500 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T9500 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T9500 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7480 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-7480 vs Core 2 Duo T9500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7480

The A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,793 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo T9500

The Core 2 Duo T9500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,799 points. Launch price was $530.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-7480 and Core 2 Duo T9500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-7480 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9500 — a 37.5% clock advantage for the A6-7480 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A6-7480 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7480 scores 1,793 against the Core 2 Duo T9500's 1,799 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9500.

Feature	A6-7480	Core 2 Duo T9500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+46%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+35%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	6 MB+500%
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,793	1,799

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7480 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7480 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T9500 — the A6-7480 supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7480) and GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T9500).

Feature	A6-7480	Core 2 Duo T9500
Socket	FM2+	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	2133+100%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32	—
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7480) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9500). The A6-7480 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo T9500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-7480 rivals Pentium G4400; Core 2 Duo T9500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.