
Radeon R5 A6-7480 vs GeForce 9650M GS

Radeon R5 A6-7480
Popular choices:

GeForce 9650M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is positioned at rank 86 and the GeForce 9650M GS is on rank 680, so the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 A6-7480
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9650M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 158.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9650M GS.
| Insight | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+158.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-158.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R5 A6-7480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $30), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 72.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+72.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 A6-7480 and GeForce 9650M GS

Radeon R5 A6-7480
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce 9650M GS
The GeForce 9650M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 790 MHz to 835 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R5 A6-7480 scores 697 versus the GeForce 9650M GS's 270 — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 leads by 158.1%. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 9650M GS uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 768 (GeForce 9650M GS). Boost clocks: 1266 MHz vs 835 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 697+158% | 270 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Boost Clock | 1266 MHz+52% | 835 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 draws 150W versus the GeForce 9650M GS's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce 9650M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 350W (GeForce 9650M GS). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.6 | 9.0+96% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R5 A6-7480 launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce 9650M GS launched at $199 and now averages $20. The GeForce 9650M GS costs 33.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.2 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) vs 13.5 (GeForce 9650M GS) — the Radeon R5 A6-7480 offers 71.9% better value. The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R5 A6-7480 | GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-82% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $20-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.2+72% | 13.5 |
| Codename | Ellesmere | N13E-GE |
| Release | June 29 2016 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #305 | #690 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












