GeForce 410M vs GeForce 9650M GS

NVIDIA

GeForce 410M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9650M GS

2012Core: 790 MHzBoost: 835 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 410M vs GeForce 9650M GS Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 410M vs GeForce 9650M GS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 410M vs GeForce 9650M GS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 410M

2015

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 9650M GS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

GeForce 9650M GS

2012

Why buy it

  • 10.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9650M GS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 410M instead at 271 vs 270, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 410M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9650M GS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9650M GS is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 410M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 410M vs GeForce 9650M GS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 410M

The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9650M GS

The GeForce 9650M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 790 MHz to 835 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 410M scores 271 and the GeForce 9650M GS reaches 270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 410M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9650M GS uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 410M) vs 768 (GeForce 9650M GS). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 835 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce 9650M GS
G3D Mark Score
271
270
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%
Boost Clock
1176 MHz+41%
835 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce 9650M GS
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 410M and 128-bit on the GeForce 9650M GS.

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce 9650M GS
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 410M) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9650M GS). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce 9650M GS
DirectX
11.0
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 410M) vs No NVENC (G84) (GeForce 9650M GS). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 410M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 9650M GS).

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce 9650M GS
Encoder
None
No NVENC (G84)
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 410M draws 33W versus the GeForce 9650M GS's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce 9650M GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 410M) vs 350W (GeForce 9650M GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce 9650M GS
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Height
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
8.2
9.0+10%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 410M (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce 9650M GS
MSRP
$199
Codename
GM108
N13E-GE
Release
March 13 2015
March 22 2012
Ranking
#847
#690

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.