GeForce 410M vs Radeon HD 2600 XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 410M vs Radeon HD 2600 XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 410M vs Radeon HD 2600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 410M

2015

Why buy it

✅22.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌32% higher power demand at 33W vs 25W.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 33W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 410M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 410M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 2600 XT instead at 283 vs 271, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 410M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 2600 XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 2600 XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 410M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 410M vs Radeon HD 2600 XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 410M

The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.

Radeon HD 2600 XT

The Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 283 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 410M scores 271 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT reaches 283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 410M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 410M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 410M) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 2600 XT).

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 2600 XT
G3D Mark Score	271	283+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS+30%	0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	192 KB+300%	48 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 410M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 2600 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 2600 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 410M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 2600 XT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 410M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the GeForce 410M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 2600 XT
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 410M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 2600 XT's 25W — a 27.6% difference. The Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 410M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 2600 XT
TDP	33W	25W-24%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	8.2	11.3+38%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 410M (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce 410M	Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	GM108	Thames
Release	March 13 2015	January 7 2013
Ranking	#847	#883

Search GeForce 410M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 2600 XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.