GeForce 410M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165

NVIDIA

GeForce 410M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 410M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 410M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 410M

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.8% in PassMark G3D (284 vs 271), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 410M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 5165 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 410M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 410M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 410M

The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 410M scores 271 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 reaches 284 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 410M is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 410M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 410M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5165).

FeatureGeForce 410MMobility Radeon HD 5165
G3D Mark Score
271
284+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
192 KB+140%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 410M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 410MMobility Radeon HD 5165
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 410M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 carries 1 GB. Mobility Radeon HD 5165 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 410M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 5165. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 410M) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 5165) — the GeForce 410M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 410MMobility Radeon HD 5165
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 410M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 410MMobility Radeon HD 5165
DirectX
11.0+9%
10.1
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 410M draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5165's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 410M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 410M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 410MMobility Radeon HD 5165
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
8.2+44%
5.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 410M (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce 410MMobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP
$49
Codename
GM108
Broadway
Release
March 13 2015
January 7 2010
Ranking
#847
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.