GeForce 410M vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce 410M
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 410M is positioned at rank 56 and the GeForce Go 7900 GTX is on rank 218, so the GeForce 410M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 410M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 410M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7900 GTX.
| Insight | GeForce 410M | GeForce Go 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 410M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 410M and GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce 410M
The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.
GeForce Go 7900 GTX
The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 410M scores 271 and the GeForce Go 7900 GTX reaches 270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 410M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce Go 7900 GTX uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 410M) vs 2,816 (GeForce Go 7900 GTX). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 410M) vs 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7900 GTX). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce Go 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 271 | 270 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2816+633% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 6.06 TFLOPS+571% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+9% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 96+1100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 176+633% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 1 MB+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce Go 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 410M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7900 GTX has 256 MB. The GeForce 410M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 410M) vs 3 MB (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) — the GeForce Go 7900 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce Go 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 410M) vs 9.0c (GeForce Go 7900 GTX). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce Go 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+22% | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.6+119% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 410M) vs No (GeForce Go 7900 GTX). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 410M) vs MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7900 GTX).
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce Go 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 410M draws 33W versus the GeForce Go 7900 GTX's 250W — a 153.4% difference. The GeForce 410M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 410M) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7900 GTX). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce Go 7900 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-87% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.2+645% | 1.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 410M and GeForce Go 7900 GTX
