
GeForce 410M

Radeon R5 235X
GeForce 410M vs Radeon R5 235X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 410M vs Radeon R5 235X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 410M vs Radeon R5 235X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 410M
2015Why buy it
- ✅8.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 80W, a 47W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
Radeon R5 235X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 410M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌142.4% higher power demand at 80W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 410M vs Radeon R5 235X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 410M
The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.

Radeon R5 235X
The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 410M scores 271 and the Radeon R5 235X reaches 277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 410M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 235X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 410M) vs 640 (Radeon R5 235X). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 410M) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 271 | 277+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 1.216 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+18% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 410M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 235X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 410M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 235X carries 1 GB. Radeon R5 235X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 410M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 235X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 410M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R5 235X) — the GeForce 410M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 410M) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 235X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 410M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 235X). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 410M draws 33W versus the Radeon R5 235X's 80W — a 83.2% difference. The GeForce 410M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 410M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235X). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-59% | 80W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.2+134% | 3.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 410M (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 410M | Radeon R5 235X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Codename | GM108 | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 13 2015 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #847 | #655 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














