GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M

NVIDIA

GeForce 410M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 410M

2015

Why buy it

  • 24.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

GeForce GT 520M

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 410M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 410M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 520M instead at 284 vs 271, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 410M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 520M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 520M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 410M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 410M

The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 520M

The GeForce GT 520M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 410M scores 271 and the GeForce GT 520M reaches 284 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 410M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 520M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 410M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 520M). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 410M) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 967 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce GT 520M
G3D Mark Score
271
284+5%
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS+22%
0.7427 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1176 MHz+22%
967 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
32+33%
L1 Cache
192 KB+500%
32 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce GT 520M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 410M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 520M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 520M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 410M and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 410M) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 520M) — the GeForce 410M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce GT 520M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 410M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce GT 520M
DirectX
11.0
11.0
OpenGL
4.6+15%
4.0
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 410M) vs No (GeForce GT 520M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 410M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520M).

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce GT 520M
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 410M draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 520M's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 410M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 410M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 520M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce GT 520M
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
8.2+44%
5.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 410M (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 410MGeForce GT 520M
MSRP
$60
Codename
GM108
GK107
Release
March 13 2015
January 9 2013
Ranking
#847
#792

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.