
GeForce 410M

GeForce GT 520M
GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 410M
2015Why buy it
- ✅24.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
GeForce GT 520M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 410M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 410M vs GeForce GT 520M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 410M
The GeForce 410M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points.

GeForce GT 520M
The GeForce GT 520M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 410M scores 271 and the GeForce GT 520M reaches 284 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 410M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 520M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 410M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 520M). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 410M) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 520M). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 967 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce GT 520M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 271 | 284+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+22% | 0.7427 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz+22% | 967 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+500% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce GT 520M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 410M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 520M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 520M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 410M and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 520M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 410M) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 520M) — the GeForce 410M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce GT 520M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 410M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 520M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce GT 520M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 410M) vs No (GeForce GT 520M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (GeForce 410M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 520M).
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce GT 520M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 410M draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 520M's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 410M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 410M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 520M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce GT 520M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-34% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 8.2+44% | 5.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 410M (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 410M | GeForce GT 520M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $60 |
| Codename | GM108 | GK107 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #847 | #792 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














